| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
turbodan
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
|
Posted: May 27, 2008 7:20 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| alexdimen wrote: |
Wow, who shit in your wheaties?
One example:
RX-7 twin turbo rotary
They boost beyond what the stock fuel system can handle when both cats have been removed. Granted, they have engines that are very sensitive to detonation. Catbacks and intake mods worsen this situation.
The situation is remedied by porting the wastegate or putting a restrictor baffle in an exhaust junction, like the downpipe to midpipe junction.
I can put you in touch with several people who have had this happen to them.
That aside... my point wasn't that it is common. I know it isn't. My point is that removing a cat can have a huge effect on exhaust flow.
Of course you won't notice much on most stock cars. There are other things that bottleneck the flow.
If you're going to argue that you can't lean out a turbo car by removing the cats, then you're crazy and you're cute S/N is BS.
It's entirely possible that on these cars it does next to nothing. I don't know much about them.... but to say that cats are not a restriction is laughable.
The new M5, huh? I suppose that's the same cat that's in a late 80's BMW?
Thanks for playing and being such an asshole about it. |
I wasn't aware that I was browsing the RX-7 TT forum. So I suppose those cars have the same cat thats in our 80's BMW's?
If the cars overboost with the cat removed, then engine failure would be related to that. If this really is the case, then the RX-7 must have an extremely undersized turbo and poorly designed exhaust system. Not to mention how stupid it is for Mazda to design a turbo engine with just enough fuel system capacity to support a bone stock engine. Smells like bullshit.
I think you need to check your tone. I dont appreciate it. If you dont know anything about these cars, you should refrain from giving people advice about them. I dont know everything about them, but I know quite enough to say you're a fucking idiot if you knock out your cat looking for exhaust flow in hope of increasing power output.
In our cars and many others, they're not a restriction. Thats a fact. I can't argue with you about the extremely irrelevant example you give about the RX-7, because I dont care enough to go look around the internet and try to find out what the hell you're talking about. In any case, you should keep that questionable experience to your posts on Mazda boards. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
disco stu
Joined: 27 Mar 2007 Location: Bham, Alabama/Sandy Springs, Georgia
|
Posted: May 27, 2008 8:36 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| as this discussion gos on i want to defend myself and say nothing in the first post was intended to be fact and that i was asking for input. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbodan
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
|
Posted: May 28, 2008 2:20 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Its good that you asked instead of just pulling your exhaust and ravaging your car with a crowbar.
The only idiots in this are those that actually believe thats a good idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmanice
Joined: 21 Aug 2006 Location: NJ
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 11:09 AM Post subject: |
|
|
honestly, if i lost 5hp when i installed headers i wouldnt care, you wouldnt even notice...
bottom line is....
headers look cleaner
headers will give you potential for more HP in the future (h/c/i or what have you)
headers look better
headers sound nice
... i know this is mainly personal preference, but its kind of obvious
if your looking for power gains, dont waste your time at all... go turbo... in my case, im broke and i just want a clean looking motor bay...
i think im going with the westcostcustomparts units... they look really clean... the stahl headers list for $1010, and ive heard that the bavauto headers had crappy welds? any foresight? ive also never seen the Ireland Engineering pieces... pics anyone?
Last edited by bmanice on Jul 02, 2008 1:11 PM; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbodan
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 11:31 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Youre broke, so you choose to *waste* money on headers? See, I just dont understand that.
They sound the same
You really might lose power
Who cares if they look better/cleaner
Stock manifolds fit the stock exhaust, which is nice. Headers require cutting/fabricating to fit and they'll probably never fit as well as the stock system does.
If you're required to run naturally aspirated by class rules, you could justify an NA build with headers. With a big cam and porting they would be worth doing. Apparently ported stock manifolds do pretty well too...
Last edited by turbodan on Jul 02, 2008 1:02 PM; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C.R. Krieger
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: Halfway up the left side of Lake Michigan
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 12:14 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| bmanice wrote: | | ... in my case, im broke and i just want a clean looking motor bay... |
If you're broke, keep your damn hood shut. Use a small fraction of the money you'd otherwise waste on headers to take your shallow friends out for coffee so they aren't trying to look at the headers you don't have.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmanice
Joined: 21 Aug 2006 Location: NJ
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 1:26 PM Post subject: |
|
|
you guys are really rediculous. why do you need to be to so on edge ALL the time. if you want to install headers do it, if you dont, than dont.
turbo obviously is the best way to make power, everyone knows this... thank you turbodan... its also not too easy to do...
and why cant someone just want to make their motor bay look clean? why do i have to keep my hood shut...
any why do you keep running your mouth C.R. Krieger??? your negativity gets old fast man... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbodan
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 2:32 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| No but really, if you're broke, why would you spend so much money on something that does less than nothing? It doesn't make sense. Your statement read as if you believed headers were some kind of low cost alternative to turbocharging, which is definitely not the case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wkohler
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 2:45 PM Post subject: |
|
|
The only thing I'm going to add here is that the ones you saw on westcoastcustomparts are the same as the IE ones. Also, the BavAuto headers are Stahl headers.
Honestly, if I had $400-$1000 to spend on something, I wouldn't start with headers. I'd put the money (if you had to spend it on your car) towards making sure your suspension and brakes are in good shape. As far as I'm concerned, the motor is the last place to spend money (not everyone agrees, but I'm not everyone). I'd pay the $520 for the Miller MAF before buying headers. There's a performance piece you'll really notice (I have never put my car on a dyno before or after, but the as close as makes no difference instantaneous throttle response is good enough for me) both in the seat and under the bonnet. I don't know about you, but I can't even see my exhaust manifolds. The stock airbox hides the front and with the cant of the motor and the heat shields, I'd have to work too hard to see them.
If you want to go spend the money on headers, do it, but it wouldn't be something I'd do before anything else if I was on a tight budget. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EuroShark
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 3:00 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | ive heard that the bavauto headers had crappy welds |
Mine are gorgeous, the welds look great! They will be going on a chipped and cammed B35 that is going into my 635CSi, and like others have said, I don't care if I get 5hp or 25hp from them, headers have always been part of the "recipe" if you will. The sound changes, the power and torque curves change, and I don't see it as a waste of money at all. However, if you are going to slap headers on a stock engine it is unlikely that you will notice much improvement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbodan
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 3:06 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Every "ingredient" should be in there for a reason. I see no reason to buy a component just to have it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmanice
Joined: 21 Aug 2006 Location: NJ
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 3:08 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| turbodan wrote: | | No but really, if you're broke, why would you spend so much money on something that does less than nothing? It doesn't make sense. Your statement read as if you believed headers were some kind of low cost alternative to turbocharging, which is definitely not the case. |
im on a "dont want to spend 4-6g's on my 88 bmw to have decent power sometimes when the PITA stand alone decides to run properly" budget... pretty sure ive heard numerous people complain about this...including you...
rather have my car look the way i want... not too worried about power... if i wanted power id buy a 5.0 mustang...
oh wait didnt i say like 14050909 times that turbo charging is the only way to go if your looking for power? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy Beamter

Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 3:20 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Krieger's not negative, he's just obsessively compulsed to point of stupidity. Which is exactly what buying headers and replacing a perfectly functional exhaust would be for someone who's as broke as you claim to be. He's trying to prevent you from doing something that'd be absolutely foolish.
If you've got $1000 burning a hole in your pocket and feel compelled to spend it on the car, we can point you in some much more cost effective directions.
Jeremy
PS - headers don't "clean up" anything in an e28 engine bay since the slant 6 is tilted with the exhaust side towards the ground. The exhaust is mostly hidden from view. You could make it more appealing by simply removing the stock manifolds and either painting them with high temp paint which might not hold up or get them ported and powder coated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy Beamter

Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 3:24 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| bmanice wrote: | | didnt i say like 14050909 times that turbo charging is the only way to go if your looking for power? |
Yes you have, but stroking Dan's ego won't make him agree with you.
You also said:
| Quote: | | in my case, im broke and i just want a clean looking motor bay... |
If cleaning up your engine bay is your goal, you've got a lot of cheaper less expensive things you can do before dropping over a grand on headers and a new exhaust.
Oh, and Dan's never bitched about his standalone being intermittent that I've seen. Mine's been perfectly reliable as well. It just takes a long time to get the settings 100% right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C.R. Krieger
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: Halfway up the left side of Lake Michigan
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 3:56 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeremy wrote: | | Krieger's not negative, he's just obsessively compulsed to point of stupidity. |
You spelled 'convulsed' wrong ...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elliott
Joined: 08 Jun 2008 Location: Elkridge, MD
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 4:17 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| wkohler wrote: | | I don't know about you, but I can't even see my exhaust manifolds. The stock airbox hides the front and with the cant of the motor and the heat shields, I'd have to work too hard to see them. |
You can alleviate the problem of not seeing the headers with a CAI system....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbodan
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 7:05 PM Post subject: |
|
|
My turbo car has run great except for when I've done stupid/careless things to it. Megasquirt does exactly what I tell it to do.
I could do it all again for under 3k. That would get me exactly to where I am now. 1.4 bar springs in the wastegate, daily driven, and now over 20 mpg thanks to the stock compression ratio. 4-6k is *a little* on the high side, especially for a basic turbo system.
If you want to buy something cool for your car, standalone is the way to go. Chicks dig guys with laptops in thier cars. I'm not even kidding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brad D. Beamter

Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 9:52 AM Post subject: |
|
|
| turbodan wrote: | My turbo car has run great except for when I've done stupid/careless things to it. Megasquirt does exactly what I tell it to do.
I could do it all again for under 3k. That would get me exactly to where I am now. 1.4 bar springs in the wastegate, daily driven, and now over 20 mpg thanks to the stock compression ratio. 4-6k is *a little* on the high side, especially for a basic turbo system.
If you want to buy something cool for your car, standalone is the way to go. Chicks dig guys with laptops in thier cars. I'm not even kidding. |
I'm definitely on the stand alone bandwagon here. Standalones rock and how well it works and drives is up to the installer and the tuner. If you do both and the car runs like poo, then you really can't blame the hardware. The most common standalone on these cars would have to be MS and there are well more sucess stories than failures. And like Dan said, if you plan right, buy the right parts once and do much of the fab work yourself and you could easily turbo the car for 3K or less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C.R. Krieger
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: Halfway up the left side of Lake Michigan
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 2:24 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Big Bronze Rim wrote: | | turbodan wrote: | My turbo car has run great except for when I've done stupid/careless things to it. Megasquirt does exactly what I tell it to do.
I could do it all again for under 3k. That would get me exactly to where I am now. 1.4 bar springs in the wastegate, daily driven, and now over 20 mpg thanks to the stock compression ratio. 4-6k is *a little* on the high side, especially for a basic turbo system.
If you want to buy something cool for your car, standalone is the way to go. Chicks dig guys with laptops in thier cars. I'm not even kidding. |
I'm definitely on the stand alone bandwagon here. Standalones rock and how well it works and drives is up to the installer and the tuner. If you do both and the car runs like poo, then you really can't blame the hardware. The most common standalone on these cars would have to be MS and there are well more sucess stories than failures. And like Dan said, if you plan right, buy the right parts once and do much of the fab work yourself and you could easily turbo the car for 3K or less. |
Aw, geez, why don't you guys get a room ...?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turbodan
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 2:53 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Already got one with your Mom.
Ohhhh
Ohhhhh |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brad D. Beamter

Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 4:10 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Haha, this thread makes me laugh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevink00
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 8:59 PM Post subject: |
|
|
To possibly add something substantive to this conversation, I took part in a dyno day many years back with several e28s. The Jim Conforti chipped stock exhaust e 28 535s that were running well put down about 150-155rwhp. My car (88 535i 5/87 build) and another had almost identical mods, with JimC chips and he had a Stahl and I had (still have) a Bavauto header. We both had hp numbers in the low/ mid170s, with torque figures approaching 200. There was only 2-3hp diff between our two cars, and about 20+ separating the non-headered cars. That number is also corraborated by the butt dyno, which says about the same. Those cast iron manifolds are corks-- 20hp and 20-25ft-lbs is a nice change, and worth the dough, I think. (the Bavauto guy tried to talk me out of them, saying they were a ho-hum mod, by the way). I think those who do not approve of the purchase are theorists, and have no real-world or empirical experience. I bought my headers on sale, and would not hesitate to recommend them. It's really elitist to say the Detroit guys need them and the BMW guys dont. Folks--these cars are 20+ years old, with engineering MUCH older than that! Let's not get delusions about our iron being so much better.
Have a nice day.
I will put on my Nomex now.
Kevin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brad D. Beamter

Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 9:29 PM Post subject: |
|
|
^^
Without dyno sheets, its just hard believe that a stock m30 with a chip and headers would make 20+hp and 25+ft-lb. I have yet to ever see anyone post a dyno sheet that would prove that either. That (and more) would be doable with a cam, and portwork but I seriously doubt headers are going to get you there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Q-ship
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: PV, AZ
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2008 10:44 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Big Bronze Rim wrote: | ^^
Without dyno sheets, its just hard believe that a stock m30 with a chip and headers would make 20+hp and 25+ft-lb. I have yet to ever see anyone post a dyno sheet that would prove that either. That (and more) would be doable with a cam, and portwork but I seriously doubt headers are going to get you there. |
Conversely, I have yet to see dyno sheets AT ALL. So no one really has proven that headers don't help, either. We have one person who has posted of a dyno session that showed an improvement, is the goal now to shout him down?
I hesitated to jump into this, but here goes. First off, to the OP-if you can't afford to modify your car, why are you asking about headers? Bored?
To the turbo guys, I'd say it's apples and oranges comparing headers to a turbo setup, and I think most of you know it. In my situation, I don't (yet) want to turbo my car. There are good reasons for this, first is weight, second is complexity, third is cost, and fourth is heat. Let me explain.
I have an E30 with the M20B25. Great little car, very fun at open track days and a great daily driver. Could use a few more beans under the hood. Don't want to go twincam, and hopping up the M20 NA is not cost effective. So an M30 swap, or turbo? An M30 will add 60ish pounds, turbo about the same or a little more. If I turbo then a standalone is preferred, and like it or not guys there is a lot of time and effort I see people putting into MS and they still have driveability issues. Makes me nervous, 'cause you guys are a lot smarter with MS than I am. Cost is more with a turbo, I know I could cobble something together but my fabrication skills are lacking, and the car deserves better than the butcher job I could do. I can swap engines though, and have it look pretty good (done it before). Fourth-and on this point I issue a mild challenge-is heat. I do track days at Willow Springs in the summer, and daily drive the car 200 miles a day to Phoenix and back. The owner of the track group I run with mentioned that he "had never seen a homebuilt turbo car complete a track day". Has anyone here ran a full track day with a turbo?
Sorry, longass paragraph. I do realize that I could make more power with a turbo M20, but the drawbacks ended up outweighing that. So for now I am putting together parts for my M30 swap, and I'd like to hear if headers are helpful! I plan on doing some mods to the engine, maybe some headwork and a cam. From past experience with small block Chevies, I know that headers on a stock engine only give a small bump, if any-but they help a lot when the engine is modded. I've seen dyno charts!!
So we have a lot of hearsay and guesses, but I haven't seen any proof one way or the other. Kevink00's post is the best I've seen, but it is still not proof. Better than the "headers don't help" crowd, though.
For the record:
I can afford the mods, thanks.
LS1's make pretty decent power with "only" 2V heads.
Cats are not evil, as long as they're under your car.
A boosted M30 in an E30 would be nucking futs.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevink00
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 10:25 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the writeupup that was posted by one of the participants that day.
http://www.mail-archive.com/bmwuucdigest@uucdigest.com/msg00993.html
Look about 75% down on the page. In this, he talks about my car as having a problem-it did-the bell housing reference sensor was bad, which produced this weird spiky sine wave dyno pattern. I went back later after fixing the problem and got almost the same result as Eric Rayl (within 2-3hp). I have the dyno sheet somewhere, but it was never scanned or saved to a computer, so it does not fall immediately to hand. In the later dyno day, which never got written up on the internet, there were at least 2 other e28s, and they put down lower numbers to the walt suman car, becuase I remember thinking at the time that his car was a really good runner--no stock e28 really matched to those figures. Again, it was 8 years ago, so for those who need proof, I will try to find my last dyno sheet, but that was 3 moves ago...
At least you have some 3rd party date to dismiss, approve or ignore! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|